TeSaMa – komputerowy serwis utrzymania bezpieczeństwa technicznego w przemyśle mechanicznym *

STRESZCZENIE: Serwis komputerowy TeSaMa łączy kwestie zarządzania bezpieczeństwem maszyn na etapie ich projektowania i użytkowania w MŚP. Opracowane narzędzia prowadzą użytkownika przez proces oceny i redukcji ryzyka oraz dostarczają informacji w zrozumiały sposób. Pozwoli to firmom spełnić wymogi prawne i poprawić ogólną produktywność.

SŁOWA KLUCZOWE: bezpieczeństwo maszyn, ocena zgodności, bezpieczeństwo techniczne

ABSTRACT: Web-based tool TeSaMa aims to provide a holistic approach for SME, giving them the ability to conduct and obtain risk assessments that include safety measure recommendations for production phase work places and machine development processes. This will enable the companies to fulfil legal requirements and improve productivity and reliability.

KEYWORDS: safety of machinery, conformity assessment, technical safety

BIBLIOGRAFIA / BIBLIOGRAPHY:

• Sorensen O.H., Hasle P., Bach E. “Working in small enterprises – is there a special risk”. Safety Sci. 45, 10 (2007): s. 1044–1059.
• Fabiano B., Curro F., Pastorino R. ”A study of the relationship between occupational injuries and firm size and type in the Italian industry”. Safety Science. 42, 7 (2004): s. 587–600.
• Stevens G. “Workplace injuries in small and large manufacturing workplaces – An analysis of the risks of fatal and non-fatal injuries, including figures for 1994/5–1995/6”. Features. Labour Market Trends. 107 (1999).
• Mayhew C. “OHS in Australian «micro» small businesses – evidence from nine research studies”. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety – Australia and New Zeland. 16, 4 (2000): s. 297–305.
• McVittie D., Banikin H., Brocklebank W. “The effect of firm size on injury frequency in construction”. Safety Science. 27, 1 (1997): s. 19–23.
• Mayhew C. “Barriers to Implementation of Known Occupational Health and Safety Solutions in Small Businesses”. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1997.
• Rigby M., Lawlor T. “Health and safety in small firms with particular reference to Spain”. International Small Business Journal. 19, 2 (2001): s. 31–48.
• Champoux D., Brun J.P. “Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises – An overview of the situation and avenues for intervention and research”. Safety Science. 41 (2003): s. 301–318.
• Lamm F., Walters D. “OHS in small organizations – Challenges and ways forward”. Regulation for a Changing Word of Work. The Australia: Federation Press, 2003.
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. ”Occupational safety and health and economic performance in small and medium-sized enterprises-a review“. Luxembourg, 2009.
• Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Gefährliche Produkte 2012 – Informationen zur Produktsicherheit. Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden (2012).
• Angermann A., Bauer R., Nossek G., Zimmermann N. “Injuries In The European Union – Statistics summary 2003–2005”. Kuratorium für Verkehrssicherheit, Vienna, 2007.
• Dźwiarek M., Hryniewicz O. „Practical examples of determination of periodical inspection of safety related control systems of machinery”. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny. 88, 5A (2012): s. 290–295.
• Bach C., Scapin D.L. ”Comparing Inspections and User Testing for the Evaluation of Virtual Environments”. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 26, 8 (2010): s. 786–824.
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. ”A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”. Management Science. 46, 2 (luty, 2000): s. 186–204.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17814/mechanik.2018.7.72

* Artykuł recenzowany